30-day trial or 30-day money back guarantee

[Point Red]

Which is better?
1) 30-day trial
2) 30-day money back guarantee

and why? (if you give me a reason, appreciated)

[Hosting24]

30 days money back is better option than 30 days trial. By offering 30 days trial, you will attract a large number of abusers who will use your servers to host phishing sites, send spam emails, etc

[getlo]

I like 30-day money back guarantee.

[shakir]

Originally Posted by Point Red

Which is better?
1) 30-day trial
2) 30-day money back guarantee

and why? (if you give me a reason, appreciated)

Actually both r same and only change is keep money around some months with the host , 30 days money back guaranty offering all the reliable host but 30 days free trail only little. But free trail some time cause of spammers and make the server slow.. So better is money back

[Hosting24]

Well, it's not the same. Free trial means you setup unlimited accounts (all for free) and start doing your dirty job, while other method does not attract so many abusers.

[pingpipe]

30-day money back guarantee is best. It prevents abuse and it's kind of like a show of good faith for both the client and the hosting company.

[generouswebhost]

30-day money back guarantee. you collect payment and the person is more likely to stay. Guess from a client prospective trial is also good to test the product without paying. Offering both is a win-win.

[HostXNow]

Offering 99% off for the first month and an 30 Day Money back Guarantee is even better.

The 1% gets you some payment details from Credit Card/PayPal, etc.

[suppleSupport]

Moneyback guarantee is better. Trials invite too many fraudulent / spammy /phishing accounts. If you do decide to offer trial periods, make sure you have a valid credit card on file to avoid fraud.

[ViVi]

I would say money back. like a lot of other's say, free trials attracts abusers.

[bermuda]

The market standard is 30 day money back guarantee as already observed on the websites of hosting leaders.